Jump Mat Vs Vertec

The vertec measures vertical jump height by an overhead target and the jump pad measure vertical jump height by flight time.

Jump mat vs vertec.

The mean difference limits of agreement were. In conclusion the portable force plate and belt mat devices provided valid measures of vertical jump height whereas the vertec and contact mat devices did not. The pearson r statistic between the video and the jump and reach vertec was 0 906. The subject was then instructed to stand on the just jump mat beneath the vertec and perform the jump.

Measurements were recorded from each of the 3 systems simultaneously for each jump. This jump timing mat device is very portable compared to the vertec though the laser system is more bulky and expensive. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the criterion validity of four popular devices for measuring vertical jump height. Subjects had a mean age of 21 86 6 39 years mean weight of 163 11 35 39 pounds and mean height of 69 20 3 88.

Seventy six college students and faculty 57 males and 19 females participated in the vertical jump height measurements. Many timing mats can also be used for timing sprints and other uses. Firstly on a vertec everyone uses the swing of their arms and the inertia they provide to propel themselves upwards because this is what happens in play. A jump mat and vertec were utilized at the student health fair of a state university in florida.

The pearson r between the video and contact mat just jump was 0 967. Compared to the optojump system 1 and contact mat 4 the vertec device has been shown to overestimate vertical jump height. With our combine athletes we test using a vertec and just jump at the same time as it adds a layer of confidence in the training data and prepares athletes for the actual testing they will do on pro day. Belt mat 0 1 5 5 cm contact mat 11 7 6 4 cm portable force plate 0 8 3 9 cm and vertec 2 4 6 6 cm.

The ezejump vertical jump testing system is a tool built for professionals. Some jump mat products add a constant to their calculated jump height to compensate for shoulder rotation and give a number closer to what a vertec might deliver. Very few tests have been published using the axon jump system. A belt mat contact mat portable force plate and vertec.

The vertical jump measurement when using this device is also not reliant on the subject timing their jump to touch something at the peak of the jump. In contrast to these findings other studies have found that the vertec device underestimates jump performance when compared to a force platform considered as the gold standard 2 and 3 camera motion capture.